Scientists from the University of Florida surveyed the vegetation at oiled and non-oiled Louisiana marsh sites to assess impacts from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
They found that shoreline vegetation confined the oil to within 15 meters from seaward edges of marsh, and that within this area, there was a mix of healthy and severely degraded oil-covered sites. Damaged vegetation in non-eroding areas nearly fully recovered after about 1.5 years. However, in areas already eroding, the oiled marsh grasses died, exposing its substrate and increasing the erosion rate that led to permanent loss. After about 18 months, the retreat rates returned to reference levels. Researchers published their findings in the July 2012 edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS): Degradation and resilience in Louisiana salt marshes after the BP–Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
From October 2010 to January 2012, the team conducted time-series studies and field experiments in Barataria Bay – an area that experienced some of the heaviest oiling. The team found that inland marshes were largely untouched by oil because the height of shore-line vegetation, which rose to the level of the high tide line, “blocked and confined” the incoming oil. However, this oil containment caused “extensive mortality of marsh plants” and “sub-lethal impacts on plants 10–20 meters from the shoreline.” The damaged sites had “oil-covered dead and horizontally-laying decaying grass stems” with surface sediment having polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) levels “greater than 100 times higher” than in the non-oiled sites. Also, there were dead mussels, snails, and below-ground plant material.
The marsh die-off led to subsequent “erosion on the steep edges of these already receding marsh platforms” and the erosion rate was “more than twice as high at oil-impacted sites.” This erosion led to permanent loss because the land was no longer present to support recovery. The “oil generated death of [the] stabilizing root matrix at the edges of these marshes triggered a geomorphic response” that led to “the degradation of the elevated platform on which marsh vegetation depends.” The team found that the die-off was most likely not caused by the oil’s toxicity but, rather, the heavy coating of oil on the plants that interfered with photosynthesis.
Researchers conducted SWAN simulations of wind-generated waves to ensure that differences in observed erosion rates between oiled and non-oiled sites were not caused from being predisposed to higher erosion rates. In fact their results showed that the “reference sites receive slightly higher wave energy fluxes than the impacted sites.”
As the study progressed, the team found “clear evidence for recovery processes.” In portions of the marsh that experienced oil damage, but had not eroded, including areas with significant root die-off, lateral plant growth from healthy areas led to “full recovery of the marsh plant cover.” Eleven months after the marshes were oiled, they found “significant increases in plant cover in areas that were barren and had nearly complete die-back of roots during our initial surveys” and that this “likely occurred via plant lateral regrowth” from nearby less-affected areas. This plant recovery did not happen in areas lost to accelerated erosion – transplanted marsh plants in these eroded areas “died within 2 months.”
The study provides both optimism – resilience and recovery of vegetation and its protection of inland areas – and concern – die-off and loss of marsh along eroding shorelines. The broader findings show that multiple stressors, including oil spills, induce environmental responses that hasten ecosystem decline in the already-vulnerable Louisiana marshes, limiting recovery of otherwise resilient vegetation and increasing permanent habitat loss and the loss of its services. The habitat loss from erosion will likely affect long-term oil spill impacts.
In their discussion, researchers noted that while this study was specific for Louisiana marshes, “the mechanisms underlying these results can likely be extended to other oil-impacted coastal salt marshes that are also characterized by erosive edges or cliffs.”
This study’s authors are Brian R. Silliman, Johan van de Koppel, Michael W. McCoy, Jessica Diller, Gabriel N. Kasozi, Kamala Earl, Peter N. Adams, and Andrew R. Zimmerman (PNAS, 2012 109 (28) 11234-11239).
Andrew Zimmerman noted that their group and another researcher published recent findings on microbial oil degradation in marsh sediment within a year of the spill. (Environmental Science & Technology, 2013 Dec, doi: 10.1021/es4036072).
This research was made possible in part by a Grant from BP/The Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative (GoMRI) to the Florida Institute of Oceanography. Other funding sources included the National Science Foundation Biological Oceanography Program.
The GoMRI is a 10-year independent research program established to study the effect, and the potential associated impact, of hydrocarbon releases on the environment and public health, as well as to develop improved spill mitigation, oil detection, characterization and remediation technologies. An independent and academic 20-member Research Board makes the funding and research direction decisions to ensure the intellectual quality, effectiveness and academic independence of the GoMRI research. All research data, findings and publications will be made publicly available. The program was established through a $500 million financial commitment from BP. For more information, visit https://gulfresearchinitiative.org/.
© Copyright 2010- 2017 Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative (GoMRI) – All Rights Reserved. Redistribution is encouraged with acknowledgement to the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative (GoMRI). Please credit images and/or videos as done in each article. Questions? Contact web-content editor Nilde “Maggie” Dannreuther, Northern Gulf Institute, Mississippi State University (email@example.com).